Tuesday, October 31, 2017

Chapter 7-8, Book Two Chapter 1-2, "Capitalists"

"But in among all this terrible poverty, there were just a few great big beautiful houses that were lived in by rich men who had as many as thirty servants to look after them. These rich men were called capitalists. They were fat ugly men with wicked faces, like the one on the picture on the opposite page. You can see that he is dressed in a long black coat which was called a frock coat, and a queer, shiny hat shaped like a stovepipe, which was called a top hat. This was the uniform of the capitalists, and no one else was allowed to wear it. The capitalists owned everything in the world, and everyone else was their slave. They owned all the land, all the houses, all the factories, and all the money. If anyone disobeyed them they could throw him into prison, or they could take his job away and starve him to death. When any ordinary person spoke to a capitalist he had to cringe and bow to him, and take off his cap and address him as a 'Sir'." (Chapter7, page 63)


Now in this specific moment, Winston is speaking about the proles and how basically they have not indoctrinated the ideas of the Party and how because of this they were very different than the Party members. Winston describes how there is more crime among the proles and they were able to do things the Party members couldn’t—like get divorced, religious worship (if they showed signs of needing it), and they were not punished for promiscuity. From this, he transitions to talking about the uncertainty of knowing the true history of the past, the time before the Revolution. This is where the concept of Capitalism brought up.
In the quote itself they talk about the time before the Party (when it was capitalist based) as basically a horrible point in time, they described it as though it was uncivilized because they mention how young children began to work and the uneven distribution of wealth among the people. Winston even notes that in the history textbook for children that most of the money belonged to rich men, who because of such wealth had a great deal of power. It is this portrayal of Capitalism that we get, basically, a ‘rude awakening’ to our society now. There is a huge parallel in multiple ways, such as the very uneven distribution of money and, the people who actually have the money and the power they yield towards the ‘ordinary people’.
It is heavily noted that there is such an uneven distribution of money in the portrayal of Capitalism shown, in the sentences before the quote it is noted how the ‘ordinary people’ had horrible living conditions, they never had enough to eat or a roof over the heads yet the rich men could afford a lot of land and ‘thirty servants’ to look after them. This may seem farfetched but it is something that is still a reality nowadays. Most of the money and wealth stays between the 1% of the country while poverty rates are going up, this is because all of the wealth stays between those who are already wealthy. This combined with the issue of taxes being raised, rent/house prices constantly increasing and the prices of everyday items becoming more and more expensive it is taking a toll on the citizens because they cannot afford what they need. This is why it is a big parallel because it is something that has always been happening and it was pointed out by Orwell yet no changes have been made to fix this because quite frankly those in power do not care to change how much power they have. Which leads us to either big parallel we can draw from this quote, which is the actual people who have the money and the power they yield.
People in power are the ones who have wealth and we can see that they do not use their power all that great. In the quote, it notes that those with money could make it so that those who disobeyed are punished (i.e. thrown into jail, starved, or take away their jobs) and this is something that we can still see nowadays. When people tend to disobey those in power it usually does not end well for the person. An example of this is the music, acting or modeling industry. Usually, those in power (which tends to be men) do not like what their employee is doing (mainly speaking out against them or anything they find unfavorable), they usually try to get rid of them. A very well-known example of this issue is one that is gaining a lot of attention in the news these days which is the issue of Harvey Weinstein. In recent days someone accused Weinstein of sexual misconduct and after it came to light we now hear more from the others whom this has also happened to. The one that many knows was greatly affected by Weinstein was Rose McGowan, this is because she had reported what Weinstein did to her a long time ago but instead of someone helping her she was blacklisted from acting because she had spoken out and the issue was brushed away until now. It is these instances that we are seeing how much power people have because of the amount of money they have. This is not the only case more and more people are speaking out about these things that have become so normalized in these industries because they were afraid of the backlash. This is why this quotation is important, you can still draw very important parallels to our society now which raises concern because it is something that has been happening for so long.
This quotation really makes people think and draw the parallels to our society now, it really shines a light on the fact that not much has changed. Those with wealth almost automatically have more power than the ‘ordinary people’ who do not have a lot of money and the wealth is usually only circulated between those who already have wealth. This really proves how times really have not changed in this aspect which is why this quote is so important.

6 comments:

  1. Hey Priscila! This blog of yours was quite impressive due to the fact that your quote has several parallels to todays world. It is kind of scary as well since George Orwell wrote this book like 60 years ago and book can be seen in todays world. Honestly, your reflection about the quote was quite impressive since it sums up the whole parallelism and the whole idea of capitalism in the book. In my opinion, I feel that the quote was eye opening in the ways that these upperclass people can be seen in our world. They are in our modern world since money dictates power in society and it was feels that people with money always seem to have the upper hand or they look down upon the "poor." I feel this is wrong in the novels time period, and wrong in our own time period. We should be able to be equal and have a say in anything even if money is a factor that weighs down the "poor." I see this quote to be quite disturbing as well since it is the ugly truth that most people in the world have to face with the wealthy.

    Your last paragraph to your blog was basically a summary of the whole quote and reflection, and honestly it was great. Even if people didn't read the whole entire blog, the last paragraph is an eye catcher in which it depicts the parallelism of the quote to our modern day society. A suggestion I have with you is that you might want to add a few pictures to your blog since it is kind of a wall of words. A few pictures can bring much more interest to your reader, and allows the readers to have connections with the pictures and the text as well.

    In my opinion, I agree 100% with your arguments since this quote produced almost 60 years ago is a complete connection to our society today. Overall, your reflection was very well written, and reading it over and over again is very pleasurable due to the fact that we can get so much more out of it each time you read it over again. It is like watching a movie more than once, and picking up key information that you didn't see during the previous times you watched the movie.

    Overall, your blog was very impressive. However, add some pictures to bring out the text. I hope to read your blog again next week.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your opinion on the quote is something I can gee with easily. It is really connection to our society today. I was able to see parallels from that time and now. In our society we really see that money is dictating power. It was also feels that people who have money somehow will always have the upper hand compared to "poor" people. For me I think it is kinda hard to read your blog maybe because of the size, it would also be better if you add pictures and maybe a easier color to read.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello again!
    I found your analysis very informative. I agree with your comparison of capitalism in the book and capitalism in real life. I also don't believe it is far-fetched to say that people are still living in poverty while others are rolling in their riches. It seems crazy to me that so many people would benefit greatly from just 1/4 of what a rich man earns in a day and yet nothing is really done to properly distribute money where it is most needed. Overall, I think you did a wonderful job on your blog.
    Until next time :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Priscila!!! Your analysis is extremely impressive considering you made it parallel things that are happening today. I totally agree how its only the wealthy who shares with the wealthy as the poor struggle to survive. I wish I could say it's surprising that Orwell's writing about wealth distribution is still correct today, but it's to be expected sadly. I really like your interpretation because you showed how power is mainly determined by money and then you related it to today and 1984.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really enjoyed the parallels you made between their past and our present. It got me towards thinking that even though the Party has a skewed view of the past those are the things that stick and they aren't even very far fetched. Orwell's projection of the future views about capitalism acts as a wake up call.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with the parallels on how the rich are able to afford thirty people to look after their house while an ordinary person is struggling to even pay rent and buy food to eat. Capitalism works in weird ways, its ironic how once someone has all the money they every wanted things tend to be cheaper because brand names pays them to use a certain product to promote them while an ordinary person has to pay full price to get the item.

    ReplyDelete